German violinist Christian Tetzlaff and the NDR Philharmonie perform Dmitri Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129. Conductor: Andrew Manze. This performance was recorded on February 17, 2022, at the NDR Hannover.

German violinist Christian Tetzlaff and the NDR Philharmonie perform Dmitri Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129. Conductor: Andrew Manze. This performance was recorded on February 17, 2022, at the NDR Hannover.

Dmitri Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2

Dmitri Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129, is a significant work in the repertoire of 20th-century classical music. Composed in 1967 (it was Shostakovich’s last concerto), it reflects the composer’s mature style, characterized by deep emotional intensity, complex harmonic language, and intricate contrapuntal textures.

The concerto was written for the renowned violinist David Oistrakh, a close friend of Shostakovich, who also premiered the composer’s first violin concerto. Shostakovich’s relationship with Oistrakh had a profound influence on the concerto, as it was tailored to showcase the violinist’s virtuosity and expressive capabilities.

Shostakovich wrote the Violin Concerto No. 2 in the spring of 1967 and intended it to serve as a 60th birthday present for its dedicatee, David Oistrakh, in September. However, Shostakovich had mistaken Oistrakh’s age; he actually turned 59 that year.

The concerto emerged during a period of personal and political turmoil for Shostakovich. Despite being one of the Soviet Union’s most celebrated composers, he lived under the constant scrutiny of the state, which had previously condemned some of his works for formalism and perceived anti-Soviet sentiments. This historical and personal context imbues the concerto with a sense of introspection and a profound emotional depth. The music oscillates between moments of brooding melancholy and vigorous intensity, creating a rich tapestry of contrasting moods.

One of the concerto’s defining features is its intricate dialogue between the soloist and the orchestra. Shostakovich masterfully balances the solo violin with the orchestral forces, allowing for a seamless interplay that enhances the dramatic narrative of the work. The orchestration is both lush and transparent, providing a supportive yet dynamic backdrop for the violin’s expressive lines.

Harmonically, the concerto is marked by Shostakovich’s use of complex, often dissonant chords that create a sense of tension and unease. These harmonic choices contribute to the overall sense of conflict and resolution that pervades the concerto. Additionally, Shostakovich employs a range of compositional techniques, including counterpoint and fugue, to add depth and texture to the musical landscape.

The concerto’s thematic material is varied and richly developed. Shostakovich often uses motifs that undergo significant transformation throughout the work, creating a sense of unity and coherence. This thematic development is a testament to the composer’s skill in crafting long-form musical narratives that engage the listener on both an intellectual and emotional level.

Movements

With start times in the video above:

  1. Moderato 00:28
  2. Adagio 14:17
  3. Adagio – Allegro 23:48

1. Moderato

The first movement of Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129, marked “Moderato,” serves as an intense and introspective opening to the concerto. It establishes a contemplative atmosphere, characterized by a somber and somewhat brooding mood.

The movement begins with a stark and pensive orchestral introduction, setting the tone for the solo violin’s entrance. The violin introduces a lyrical and expressive theme, which is notable for its emotional depth and nuance. This theme is developed throughout the movement, undergoing various transformations that highlight the violin’s virtuosic capabilities and the composer’s skill in thematic development.

Shostakovich employs a rich harmonic language, using dissonances and unexpected chord progressions to create a sense of tension and unease. This harmonic complexity adds to the movement’s introspective quality, as the music often shifts between moments of lyrical beauty and darker, more turbulent passages.

The interplay between the solo violin and the orchestra is intricate and dynamic. Shostakovich masterfully balances the forces, allowing the violin to shine while also integrating it seamlessly with the orchestral textures. The dialogue between the violin and different sections of the orchestra adds layers of complexity and depth to the movement.

Rhythmically, the movement is marked by a sense of fluidity and subtle shifts in tempo. Shostakovich’s use of syncopation and rhythmic variation adds to the movement’s sense of unpredictability and emotional nuance. The solo violin often leads with poignant, singing lines that are supported and sometimes contrasted by the orchestra’s more rhythmically driven passages.

One of the striking features of this movement is its use of counterpoint. Shostakovich weaves intricate contrapuntal lines, creating a rich tapestry of sound that enhances the movement’s expressive power. This counterpoint is evident in the interactions between the soloist and the orchestra, as well as within the solo violin’s own lines.

As the movement progresses, the thematic material is revisited and reinterpreted, leading to a sense of cohesion and continuity. Shostakovich’s ability to transform and develop his themes keeps the listener engaged and creates a compelling narrative arc within the movement.

The first movement concludes with a return to the contemplative mood established at the beginning. The solo violin and orchestra come together to bring the movement to a reflective and poignant close, setting the stage for the contrasting moods and themes of the subsequent movements.

2. Adagio

The second movement of Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129, is marked “Adagio.” This movement stands out for its profound emotional depth and lyrical beauty, offering a stark contrast to the more introspective and brooding nature of the first movement.

The “Adagio” opens with a poignant and expressive melody introduced by the solo violin. This melody is lyrical and expansive, characterized by long, flowing lines that showcase the violin’s capacity for sustained, singing tones. The theme is imbued with a sense of melancholy and longing, reflecting Shostakovich’s ability to convey deep emotion through his music.

Throughout the movement, the solo violin takes center stage, weaving intricate and expressive lines that explore a wide range of dynamics and articulations. Shostakovich’s writing for the violin in this movement is particularly notable for its demand on the performer’s expressive capabilities, requiring a deep sensitivity to the nuances of phrasing and tone color.

The orchestral accompaniment in the second movement is sparse and supportive, allowing the solo violin to shine. The orchestration is delicate and transparent, with the orchestra providing a soft, harmonic backdrop that enhances the lyrical qualities of the solo line. The interplay between the violin and the orchestra is intimate, creating a chamber music-like atmosphere that heightens the movement’s emotional impact.

Harmonically, the “Adagio” is rich and complex, with Shostakovich using lush, chromatic harmonies to add depth and color to the music. The harmonic progressions often create a sense of yearning and unresolved tension, mirroring the emotional intensity of the solo violin’s melody. These harmonic choices contribute to the movement’s overall mood of introspective melancholy.

The structure of the movement is marked by a series of variations on the opening theme. Shostakovich skillfully develops the thematic material, introducing subtle changes in melody, harmony, and orchestration that keep the listener engaged. Each variation adds a new layer of emotional depth, as the solo violin explores different facets of the central theme.

One of the most striking moments in the second movement is a cadenza-like passage for the solo violin. This section allows the violinist to display both technical prowess and expressive intensity, with virtuosic runs, double stops, and intricate ornamentation. The cadenza-like passage serves as a focal point of the movement, heightening the emotional drama before leading back to a restatement of the opening theme.

The “Adagio” concludes with a return to the quiet, contemplative mood established at the beginning. The final passages are marked by a sense of resignation and quiet beauty, as the solo violin and orchestra come together to bring the movement to a gentle, poignant close. This ending sets the stage for the contrasting character of the third and final movement.

3. Adagio – Allegro

The third movement of Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in C-sharp minor, Op. 129, marked “Adagio – Allegro,” serves as a dramatic and compelling conclusion to the concerto. This movement begins with a slow, introspective introduction (“Adagio”), before launching into a vigorous and energetic final section (“Allegro”).

The “Adagio” section that opens the movement features a haunting and lyrical melody played by the solo violin. This theme, while brief, sets a somber and reflective tone, providing a poignant contrast to the energetic “Allegro” that follows. The orchestration in this section is sparse and atmospheric, with the orchestra providing a subdued, yet supportive background to the violin’s expressive lines. This introduction creates a sense of anticipation and tension, setting the stage for the dynamic shift that occurs when the tempo changes.

Transitioning into the “Allegro,” the movement takes on a lively and spirited character. The solo violin introduces a vigorous and rhythmic theme, marked by its playful and almost dance-like quality. This theme is developed extensively throughout the movement, with Shostakovich employing various techniques to maintain the listener’s interest and excitement. The “Allegro” is characterized by its driving rhythms, sharp accents, and dynamic contrasts, all of which contribute to the movement’s energetic and exuberant mood.

The interplay between the solo violin and the orchestra in the “Allegro” is particularly dynamic. Shostakovich creates a dialogue where the violin and the orchestra often exchange thematic material, creating a sense of conversation and interaction. The orchestration is more robust in this section, with the full orchestra engaging in the energetic thematic development, adding to the movement’s intensity and excitement.

One of the hallmarks of this movement is its use of folk-like melodies and rhythms. Shostakovich frequently drew inspiration from Russian folk music, and this influence is evident in the lively, dance-like themes of the “Allegro.” These folk elements add a sense of rustic charm and vigor to the movement, contributing to its overall sense of joy and celebration.

The technical demands on the solo violinist in this movement are considerable. The violin part features rapid passages, intricate double stops, and frequent changes in articulation and dynamics. These challenges require a high level of virtuosity and precision from the performer, adding to the movement’s sense of excitement and brilliance.

As the movement progresses, Shostakovich revisits the themes introduced earlier, weaving them into a complex and cohesive musical narrative. The development section is marked by its inventive variations on the main themes, showcasing the composer’s skill in transforming and elaborating his musical ideas.

The movement builds to a thrilling and exuberant climax, with the solo violin and orchestra driving toward a powerful and decisive conclusion. The final passages are marked by their energy and intensity, bringing the concerto to a rousing and satisfying close. The dramatic contrast between the reflective “Adagio” introduction and the vibrant “Allegro” finale highlights Shostakovich’s ability to create a rich and varied emotional landscape within a single movement.

Sources

M. Özgür Nevres

Published by M. Özgür Nevres

I am Özgür Nevres, a software engineer, a former road racing cyclist, and also an amateur musician. I opened andantemoderato.com to share my favorite music. I also take care of stray cats & dogs. This website's all income goes directly to our furry friends. Please consider supporting me on Patreon, so I can help more animals!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.